The phrase “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” represents an inquiry concerning the monetary accountability of medical insurance suppliers for the prescription remedy Latisse. This remedy is primarily used to deal with hypotrichosis of the eyelashes, a situation characterised by insufficient or inadequate eyelashes. People contemplating this therapy usually search to know if their insurance coverage coverage will offset the associated fee.
The protection standing of prescription drugs is critical because it straight impacts accessibility and affordability. A optimistic dedication of protection can considerably cut back out-of-pocket bills, making the therapy extra accessible to a wider inhabitants. Traditionally, beauty procedures or therapies have usually been excluded from insurance coverage protection; nonetheless, the medical necessity of a therapy can affect this determination. Understanding these elements is crucial for people exploring choices to handle inadequate eyelash progress.
The next sections will delve into the determinants of protection choices, discover widespread causes for denials, and description methods for interesting protection determinations associated to prescriptions for eyelash progress drugs. The article will even tackle various choices for managing the prices related to this particular therapy.
1. Formulary Inclusion
The inclusion of a drugs on an insurance coverage plan’s formulary is a main determinant of whether or not the plan will present protection. Within the context of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” formulary standing is the preliminary hurdle to beat; if Latisse shouldn’t be listed, protection is extremely unlikely.
-
Formulary Tiers and Value Sharing
Insurance coverage formularies are sometimes structured into tiers, every related to a special stage of cost-sharing. Latisse’s tier placement considerably impacts out-of-pocket bills. If Latisse is included on the next tier (e.g., specialty medication), the copay or coinsurance could also be substantial, even whether it is technically coated. Conversely, placement on a most well-liked tier ends in decrease prices. The formulary tier construction straight influences affordability, even when a drugs is listed.
-
Formulary Exclusions and Alternate options
Insurance policy could explicitly exclude sure drugs or lessons of medicines from their formularies. Within the case of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” the plan may exclude all drugs meant for beauty functions, no matter their medical functions. Alternatively, the plan could embrace options, reminiscent of generic variations or different drugs meant to deal with the identical situation, whereas particularly excluding Latisse. Understanding the plan’s exclusions and accessible options is essential.
-
Formulary Updates and Opinions
Insurance coverage formularies usually are not static; they’re topic to periodic updates and opinions. Drugs could also be added, eliminated, or have their tier placement adjusted. Because of this even when Latisse was beforehand coated underneath a selected insurance coverage plan, its protection standing may change. Sufferers ought to frequently confirm their plan’s formulary to make sure continued protection and pay attention to any modifications which will have an effect on their entry to the remedy.
-
Negotiated Pricing and Producer Rebates
Insurance coverage firms negotiate pricing with pharmaceutical producers to acquire favorable charges for drugs included of their formularies. These negotiations can contain rebates, reductions, or different cost-saving measures. The inclusion of Latisse on a formulary could also be contingent upon the producer providing an appropriate worth to the insurance coverage firm. This demonstrates the interaction between market forces and insurance coverage protection choices.
In abstract, formulary inclusion is a crucial consideration when figuring out “will insurance coverage cowl latisse.” Tier placement, exclusions, updates, and negotiated pricing every play a job within the final price to the affected person. Checking the particular plan’s formulary is a essential first step in figuring out whether or not the remedy is eligible for protection and what the related prices will likely be.
2. Medical Necessity
The idea of medical necessity considerably influences whether or not insurance coverage gives protection for Latisse. Whereas primarily marketed for beauty functions, the rationale behind its prescription dictates the chance of reimbursement. Insurance coverage suppliers sometimes require demonstrable medical necessity earlier than approving protection for therapies that could possibly be thought-about elective. As an illustration, if eyelash hypotrichosis is a direct consequence of a medical situation or therapy, reminiscent of alopecia areata or chemotherapy-induced hair loss, the argument for medical necessity strengthens significantly. A doctor’s documentation explicitly linking the situation to the prescription is essential. With out this justification, the request for protection usually faces denial.
The excellence between beauty enhancement and addressing a medical situation is paramount. A affected person in search of Latisse solely for aesthetic enchancment is much less more likely to safe protection in comparison with a person whose eyelash loss impacts their bodily or psychological well-being because of an underlying medical problem. Insurance coverage firms usually have particular standards for figuring out medical necessity, together with the severity of the situation, its influence on the affected person’s high quality of life, and the supply of other therapies. Pre-authorization processes usually contain submitting detailed medical data to substantiate the declare of medical necessity.
In the end, the phrase “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” is straight depending on establishing medical necessity. Efficiently demonstrating that Latisse shouldn’t be merely for beauty enchancment however is a essential part of treating a medical situation considerably will increase the probabilities of protection. Navigating this course of requires clear and complete documentation from the prescribing doctor and a radical understanding of the insurance coverage plan’s particular necessities for figuring out medical necessity. Lack of ample documentation usually results in denial, highlighting the essential function of doctor involvement within the pre-approval course of.
3. Plan Exclusions
Plan exclusions are a essential part in figuring out whether or not insurance coverage will cowl Latisse. Insurance coverage insurance policies explicitly listing companies, therapies, or drugs they don’t cowl. These exclusions straight reply the query, “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” if the particular plan categorically denies protection for beauty therapies or drugs primarily used for aesthetic functions. The presence of such an exclusion sometimes ends in automated denial of protection, no matter a doctor’s prescription or perceived medical necessity by the affected person. For instance, a plan could state “beauty procedures and drugs” usually are not coated, successfully precluding protection for Latisse, even when the person argues for off-label use or psychological misery associated to hypotrichosis. The cause-and-effect relationship is direct: an exclusion exists, subsequently protection is denied. Understanding these exclusions is subsequently very important earlier than pursuing a prescription and incurring prices.
The importance of plan exclusions extends past easy denial; it additionally dictates the parameters for potential appeals or exceptions. Even with a powerful medical justification, overcoming a transparent and unambiguous exclusion might be exceptionally difficult. Some plans could provide riders or supplemental protection that tackle particular exclusions, however these are sometimes pricey and should still impose limitations. Moreover, the interpretation of what constitutes a “beauty” therapy might be subjective, resulting in disputes. A person whose hypotrichosis stems from a medical situation, reminiscent of thyroid dysfunction, may argue that Latisse addresses a symptom of that situation and is subsequently not strictly beauty. Nevertheless, the insurance coverage firm should still classify it as such, citing the remedy’s main indication. The sensible significance lies within the want for sufferers to totally evaluation their coverage paperwork and perceive all related exclusions previous to in search of therapy, to keep away from surprising monetary burdens.
In conclusion, plan exclusions function a elementary barrier to insurance coverage protection for Latisse. These exclusions usually are not merely procedural formalities however definitive statements of what a coverage won’t cowl. Navigating the complexities of exclusions requires cautious examination of coverage paperwork, a transparent understanding of the excellence between medical necessity and beauty enhancement, and a practical evaluation of the chance of overturning a denial based mostly on an outlined exclusion. In the end, the existence of a related plan exclusion usually gives a definitive reply to the query of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” emphasizing the significance of due diligence earlier than initiating therapy.
4. Prior authorization
Prior authorization is a course of carried out by insurance coverage firms to handle prescription drug prices and guarantee acceptable remedy use. Within the context of figuring out “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” prior authorization acts as a big procedural checkpoint that have to be efficiently navigated to safe protection. This course of introduces a layer of scrutiny past merely having a prescription from a licensed doctor.
-
Necessity of Justification
Prior authorization requires physicians to offer detailed justification for prescribing Latisse. This consists of documentation of the affected person’s medical historical past, the particular prognosis resulting in the prescription, and a rationale for why Latisse is deemed essentially the most acceptable therapy possibility. Inadequate justification is a standard trigger for denial. An instance can be prescribing Latisse for easy beauty enhancement with out documenting a medical necessity, reminiscent of chemotherapy-induced hypotrichosis. The doctor should articulate why different, doubtlessly cheaper, options usually are not appropriate.
-
Alignment with Formulary and Medical Insurance policies
The prior authorization course of assesses whether or not the prescribed use of Latisse aligns with the insurance coverage plan’s formulary and established medical insurance policies. Plans usually have particular standards for approving drugs like Latisse, specializing in elements such because the severity of the situation, earlier therapies tried, and potential contraindications. If the prescription doesn’t meet these standards, prior authorization is usually denied. This step ensures that the prescribed therapy aligns with the insurer’s established tips for acceptable and cost-effective care.
-
Affect on Affected person Entry and Delays
The requirement for prior authorization can introduce delays in affected person entry to Latisse. The method entails the doctor submitting the mandatory documentation to the insurance coverage firm, which then opinions the knowledge and decides. This evaluation interval can vary from a number of days to weeks, throughout which the affected person can’t acquire the remedy. Such delays might be notably problematic when immediate therapy is desired or essential as a result of affected person’s situation. Even with approval, the delay could deter some sufferers from pursuing the therapy.
-
Attraction Mechanisms for Denials
If prior authorization is denied, sufferers and physicians have the appropriate to attraction the choice. The appeals course of sometimes entails submitting extra info to assist the case for protection, reminiscent of knowledgeable opinions or extra detailed medical data. Understanding the insurance coverage plan’s particular appeals course of and timelines is essential for efficiently difficult a denial. Nevertheless, even with a well-documented attraction, there is no such thing as a assure that the preliminary denial will likely be overturned. The end result usually depends upon the particular particulars of the case and the insurer’s interpretation of medical necessity.
In abstract, prior authorization is a essential step in figuring out “will insurance coverage cowl latisse.” It acts as a gatekeeper, requiring physicians to justify the medical necessity of the prescription and guaranteeing that it aligns with the insurance coverage plan’s formulary and medical insurance policies. Whereas prior authorization may also help management prices and promote acceptable remedy use, it could additionally introduce delays and boundaries to entry for sufferers in search of Latisse. Understanding the method and getting ready complete documentation are important for navigating this hurdle and rising the chance of protection.
5. Beauty Procedures
The categorization of a therapy as a beauty process considerably impacts the dedication of whether or not insurance coverage will cowl it. Inquiries concerning “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” are regularly met with skepticism as a result of Latisse is commonly perceived as a therapy for beauty enhancement moderately than a medically essential intervention. This notion stems from its main use in addressing hypotrichosis of the eyelashes, a situation that, in lots of instances, doesn’t inherently impair bodily well being or perform. In consequence, insurance coverage insurance policies usually exclude protection for procedures and drugs deemed solely beauty, straight affecting the reply to “will insurance coverage cowl latisse.” A typical instance is the specific exclusion of aesthetic therapies from customary medical insurance plans, reflecting a prioritization of therapies addressing medical circumstances over these enhancing bodily look. The sensible significance of this understanding lies within the want for sufferers and physicians to exhibit the medical necessity of Latisse, shifting past a purely beauty rationale to safe insurance coverage protection.
Additional complicating the difficulty is the evolving definition of “beauty” and “medically essential.” Whereas some instances of hypotrichosis are purely aesthetic, others could stem from underlying medical circumstances reminiscent of alopecia areata, thyroid issues, or the unwanted effects of chemotherapy. In these cases, the argument for Latisse as a therapy addressing a symptom of a medical situation positive factors traction. Insurance coverage firms could require detailed documentation from a doctor establishing this hyperlink, together with medical data, diagnostic check outcomes, and a transparent clarification of how the eyelash loss impacts the affected person’s total well being or psychological well-being. For instance, extreme eyelash loss following chemotherapy can result in psychological misery and impaired shallowness, doubtlessly justifying the usage of Latisse as a medically essential intervention to enhance the affected person’s high quality of life. This highlights the nuanced interaction between beauty notion and medical actuality, underscoring the necessity for thorough analysis and documentation when in search of insurance coverage protection.
In conclusion, the classification of Latisse as a beauty process presents a big problem to acquiring insurance coverage protection. Whereas its main indication is commonly seen as aesthetic enhancement, demonstrating a direct hyperlink to an underlying medical situation or the therapy thereof can strengthen the argument for medical necessity and enhance the chance of reimbursement. Sufferers and physicians should navigate the complexities of insurance coverage insurance policies, offering clear and complete documentation to assist their claims. In the end, the reply to “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” usually hinges on efficiently distinguishing between beauty enhancement and medically justified therapy, a distinction that requires cautious consideration and compelling proof.
6. Hypotrichosis prognosis
A confirmed prognosis of hypotrichosis is a pivotal factor in figuring out the chance of insurance coverage protection for Latisse. Whereas the remedy is indicated for this particular conditioninadequate or inadequate eyelashesthe mere presence of hypotrichosis doesn’t mechanically assure protection. The specificity and etiology of the prognosis are essential elements thought-about by insurance coverage suppliers when evaluating a declare for reimbursement. A prognosis merely labeled “hypotrichosis” with out additional clarification could also be inadequate. A extra detailed prognosis specifying the underlying trigger, reminiscent of chemotherapy-induced hypotrichosis or hypotrichosis secondary to alopecia areata, gives stronger justification for protection. The connection lies in demonstrating that the eyelash deficiency shouldn’t be merely a beauty concern however a direct consequence of a medical situation or its therapy.
Insurance coverage firms usually scrutinize the diagnostic standards used to determine hypotrichosis and its severity. Standardized scales or photographic documentation could also be required to objectively assess the diploma of eyelash loss. This goal evaluation is essential in differentiating between regular variations in eyelash density and a real medical situation warranting therapy. As an illustration, a affected person with minimal eyelash thinning is perhaps denied protection, whereas a person with important eyelash loss inflicting useful impairment or psychological misery could also be permitted. The prognosis, subsequently, must be supported by medical proof and exhibit a measurable influence on the affected person’s well-being. The absence of a transparent and well-documented prognosis weakens the case for medical necessity, considerably impacting the response to the inquiry of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse.”
In conclusion, a well-defined and substantiated hypotrichosis prognosis is a cornerstone within the technique of securing insurance coverage protection for Latisse. The diagnostic specificity, severity evaluation, and underlying trigger all contribute to the power of the declare. The challenges lie in offering ample medical proof and demonstrating the medical necessity of therapy past purely beauty enhancement. An intensive understanding of the insurance coverage supplier’s diagnostic standards and documentation necessities is crucial for navigating the complexities of protection dedication and rising the probabilities of a optimistic final result concerning whether or not the insurance coverage will cowl the remedy.
7. Tier placement
Tier placement inside an insurance coverage formulary considerably influences the out-of-pocket price related to a prescription remedy. When contemplating “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” it’s essential to know that protection doesn’t essentially equate to affordability. Tier placement determines the extent of cost-sharing a affected person incurs.
-
Formulary Tiers and Value-Sharing
Insurance coverage formularies categorize medication into tiers, every with a special cost-sharing construction. Decrease tiers sometimes embrace generic medication with minimal copays, whereas greater tiers embody brand-name and specialty drugs with progressively greater copays or coinsurance percentages. Latisse, as a brand-name drug, is unlikely to be positioned on a decrease tier. Its tier placement straight impacts the affected person’s monetary accountability, even when the remedy is technically “coated” by the insurance coverage plan.
-
Affect on Affordability
The upper the tier on which Latisse is positioned, the higher the affected person’s out-of-pocket expense. This may vary from a considerable copay per prescription to a big proportion of the drug’s whole price. For instance, if Latisse is on a specialty tier, the affected person is perhaps accountable for 25% to 50% of the remedy’s worth, doubtlessly rendering it unaffordable regardless of insurance coverage protection. Affordability, subsequently, turns into a essential issue even when protection exists, straight influencing the affected person’s determination to fill the prescription.
-
Negotiated Pricing and Tier Project
Insurance coverage firms negotiate drug costs with pharmaceutical producers. The negotiated worth and any rebates or reductions secured can affect the tier placement of a selected remedy. If the producer presents important price concessions, the insurance coverage firm could also be extra inclined to put the drug on a decrease tier. Nevertheless, if the producer doesn’t provide ample reductions, the remedy could also be positioned on the next tier, rising the affected person’s price burden. These negotiations not directly have an effect on the buyer’s “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” equation by influencing the last word worth.
-
Tier Exceptions and Appeals
In sure circumstances, it could be potential to request a tier exception from the insurance coverage firm. This entails demonstrating that the prescribed remedy is medically essential and that lower-tier options usually are not acceptable for the affected person’s particular situation. The success of a tier exception request depends upon the person insurance coverage plan’s insurance policies and the power of the medical justification supplied by the prescribing doctor. Efficiently interesting the next tier placement can considerably cut back the out-of-pocket price, making the remedy extra accessible to the affected person.
In conclusion, whereas the preliminary query “will insurance coverage cowl latisse” could elicit a optimistic response, the next dedication of tier placement dictates the monetary accessibility of the remedy. Understanding the intricacies of tier constructions, potential cost-sharing obligations, and the potential for tier exceptions is crucial for making knowledgeable choices concerning therapy choices and navigating the complexities of insurance coverage protection. The last word worth of protection is subsequently depending on the affordability afforded by its tier project.
8. Appeals course of
The appeals course of represents a proper mechanism for contesting an insurance coverage firm’s denial of protection. Within the context of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” understanding and successfully using the appeals course of is essential when preliminary claims for reimbursement are rejected.
-
Grounds for Attraction
Appeals are sometimes initiated when an insurance coverage firm denies protection for Latisse based mostly on causes reminiscent of lack of medical necessity, categorization as a beauty process, or plan exclusions. The premise for the attraction have to be clearly articulated, usually requiring the submission of extra medical documentation, knowledgeable opinions, or persuasive arguments difficult the insurer’s rationale. A robust attraction demonstrates why the preliminary denial was incorrect and why Latisse needs to be coated underneath the particular insurance coverage plan. As an illustration, if the denial was based mostly on lack of medical necessity, an attraction would necessitate presenting compelling proof of the underlying medical situation contributing to hypotrichosis.
-
Ranges of Attraction
The appeals course of usually entails a number of ranges of evaluation, beginning with an inside evaluation by the insurance coverage firm and doubtlessly escalating to an exterior evaluation by an impartial third occasion. Every stage requires the submission of more and more detailed documentation and arguments. Failure to exhaust all ranges of attraction can preclude additional authorized motion. The iterative nature of the method emphasizes the significance of meticulous record-keeping and constant advocacy all through every stage. Escalating to an exterior evaluation board gives a possibility for an neutral evaluation of the medical necessity and appropriateness of Latisse therapy, providing a last avenue for securing protection.
-
Documentation Necessities
Profitable appeals necessitate complete documentation, together with detailed medical data, doctor statements, images, and peer-reviewed literature supporting the usage of Latisse for the particular situation. The documentation ought to clearly tackle the explanations for the preliminary denial and supply compelling proof of medical necessity. Inadequate or poorly organized documentation weakens the attraction and will increase the chance of continued denial. For instance, if the attraction is predicated on a prognosis of alopecia areata inflicting hypotrichosis, medical data confirming the prognosis, therapy historical past, and the influence of eyelash loss on the affected person’s high quality of life needs to be included.
-
Time Constraints and Deadlines
The appeals course of is topic to strict time constraints and deadlines. Failure to stick to those deadlines may end up in the forfeiture of the appropriate to attraction. Insurance coverage firms sometimes present a restricted window for initiating an attraction and for submitting extra documentation. Managing these deadlines requires diligent monitoring and proactive communication with the insurance coverage supplier. Lacking a deadline can necessitate beginning the method anew, delaying entry to therapy and doubtlessly incurring extra prices. Subsequently, well timed adherence to the prescribed timelines is essential for preserving the chance to problem a denial and in the end safe protection for Latisse.
The appeals course of is subsequently integral to addressing denials associated to the query of “will insurance coverage cowl latisse.” Successfully navigating this course of, from understanding the grounds for attraction to assembly documentation necessities and adhering to strict deadlines, considerably enhances the prospects of overturning an preliminary denial and acquiring the mandatory protection for therapy.
Often Requested Questions
This part addresses widespread queries concerning insurance coverage protection for Latisse, offering factual info to help in understanding protection potentialities.
Query 1: What elements most importantly affect whether or not insurance coverage will cowl Latisse?
A number of elements are essential. These embrace the remedy’s presence on the insurance coverage plan’s formulary, a dedication of medical necessity, and the absence of express plan exclusions for beauty therapies.
Query 2: How can “medical necessity” be established for a Latisse prescription?
Medical necessity might be demonstrated by offering documentation that hypotrichosis is secondary to a medical situation, reminiscent of alopecia areata or chemotherapy-induced hair loss. This documentation ought to come from a certified doctor and clearly articulate the hyperlink between the underlying medical situation and the necessity for Latisse.
Query 3: If an insurance coverage plan excludes beauty procedures, is there any chance of protection for Latisse?
Overcoming a beauty process exclusion might be difficult, however not unattainable. If the hypotrichosis considerably impacts psychological well-being or useful capacity (e.g., safety of the eyes), an attraction based mostly on medical necessity with supporting documentation could also be thought-about.
Query 4: What function does prior authorization play in figuring out protection for Latisse?
Prior authorization serves as a gatekeeper. It requires physicians to justify the prescription of Latisse by demonstrating that the affected person meets particular standards outlined by the insurance coverage plan. Failure to acquire prior authorization sometimes ends in denial of protection.
Query 5: If an preliminary declare is denied, what steps might be taken to attraction the choice?
The appeals course of entails submitting extra documentation, reminiscent of medical data, doctor statements, and peer-reviewed literature, to assist the declare for protection. Understanding the insurance coverage plan’s particular appeals course of and adhering to all deadlines is crucial.
Query 6: How does the tier placement of Latisse throughout the insurance coverage formulary have an effect on the out-of-pocket price?
The tier placement dictates the extent of cost-sharing. Larger tiers usually correspond to greater copays or coinsurance percentages. Even when Latisse is roofed, placement on the next tier can considerably enhance the out-of-pocket expense for the affected person.
The previous solutions present a common overview. Particular person insurance policy range, and consulting the particular coverage paperwork and contacting the insurance coverage supplier straight are beneficial for customized info.
The next part explores various cost-saving measures for buying Latisse.
Navigating the Prices
This part presents methods for managing the price of Latisse when insurance coverage protection is unavailable or inadequate. The intent is to offer actionable info for people in search of cost-effective options.
Tip 1: Discover Producer Financial savings Packages: Pharmaceutical firms usually provide affected person help applications or low cost playing cards. Examine whether or not Allergan, the producer of Latisse, gives such choices. Eligibility sometimes depends upon earnings and insurance coverage standing.
Tip 2: Examine Costs at Totally different Pharmacies: Prescription drug costs can range considerably between pharmacies. Name native pharmacies and on-line retailers to check prices. Take into account each impartial pharmacies and bigger chain shops.
Tip 3: Inquire About Generic Alternate options: Whereas a direct generic equal of Latisse shouldn’t be presently accessible, inquire with a doctor about various drugs or therapies which may be extra inexpensive and obtain related outcomes. Remember that outcomes could range.
Tip 4: Take into account Buying from Canadian Pharmacies: Ordering pharmaceuticals from licensed Canadian pharmacies can typically be less expensive. Confirm the pharmacy’s legitimacy and be sure that the remedy is FDA-approved or its equal in Canada.
Tip 5: Consider Affected person Help Packages: Sure nonprofit organizations and affected person advocacy teams provide help with remedy prices. Analysis applications that particularly tackle beauty or dermatological therapies.
Tip 6: Talk about Choices with Your Doctor: Brazenly talk about the monetary constraints with the prescribing doctor. They are able to present samples, recommend various therapy methods, or join sufferers with assets to decrease prices.
Implementing these cost-saving methods can considerably cut back the monetary burden of Latisse therapy, bettering affordability and accessibility.
The next part summarizes the important components for figuring out protection chances.
Will Insurance coverage Cowl Latisse
This exploration of the query, “will insurance coverage cowl latisse,” has revealed a panorama characterised by a number of determinants and potential boundaries. Formulary inclusion, demonstration of medical necessity, absence of plan exclusions, profitable navigation of prior authorization necessities, and acceptable tier placement all contribute to the last word protection determination. The interaction of those elements necessitates thorough investigation of particular person insurance coverage plan insurance policies and proactive communication with each the insurer and prescribing doctor. The notion of Latisse as a beauty therapy stays a big obstacle to protection, requiring sturdy justification of medical want to beat this hurdle. Value mitigation methods are important when insurance coverage protection proves insufficient or unattainable.
The choice to pursue Latisse therapy requires cautious consideration of economic implications. Whereas protection is feasible underneath particular circumstances, the onus rests on the person to know their insurance coverage plan’s necessities and advocate for his or her wants. A proactive strategy, coupled with complete documentation and knowledgeable decision-making, maximizes the chance of securing inexpensive entry to this remedy.
